Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for a well-written document. A procedural point: as Dhruv is listed as a contributing author, it would have been better had someone else been assigned as the document shepherd. Not a big thing, but something to remember for next time. A couple of minor editorial comments: — Section 3.2.2 — The value part comprises of - We don’t say “comprises of”, and the dash isn’t right. Make it: The value part comprises: — Section 3.3.2 — The usage of Domain-ID TLV, carried in an OPEN object, is used to Remove “usage of”, as it’s redundant. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
