Hi Dhruv, We will publish another version with 5 authors and 2 contributors as well include implementation status.
Thanks, Siva -----Original Message----- From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 5:55 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: WG LC prep for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request Hi Authors, In preparation for WG LC for this I-D, please update the document to include the 'Implementation Status' Section as per the new implementation policy [1]. You also have 7 authors, we usually limit to 5 on front page and rest as contributors [2]. Hari is assigned as the document shepherd for this I-D. There are no IPR declared on this I-D. We will start the IPR poll along with WGLC to reconfirm. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions/concerns. -- Hi WG, You don't have to wait for the official WGLC, add this I-D in your review queue and please provide comments! Thanks! Dhruv, Julien & Adrian [1] "All WG I-Ds are required to include an 'Implementation Status' Section (as per RFC7942) to document known existing or planned implementations. The chairs can make exceptions on a per-document basis." [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.1.1 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
