All, Obviously we have cut some slack for the documents that are further advanced.
But a number of you have asked that your drafts be considered for WG last call, and a few are in the queue (see the lists on the wiki at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pce/). If you are hoping that your document will advance soon and if it doesn't address the implementation policy, your expectations may be sadly disappointed. New revisions of your drafts may be needed. Thanks, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 09 May 2019 10:42 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pce] Proposed Implementation Policy for PCE WG Hi WG, The poll is closed. We have an implementation policy set for the PCE WG - "All WG I-Ds are required to include an 'Implementation Status' Section (as per RFC7942) to document known existing or planned implementations. The chairs can make exceptions on a per-document basis." It is expected that all WG I-Ds requesting WG LC from now on (May 2019), must follow the above implementation policy. Reach out to the chairs in case an exception needs to be made for your document. Refer the wiki - https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pce/ for the policy as well as WG queues/status. Thanks! Dhruv, Julien & Adrian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
