Dear PCE Working Group, 

Please find an updated version of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce. Updates to
the I-D include:

- Clarification of stateful deployment scenarios and use cases
- Terminology clean-up
- Reference clean-up and proper assignment into normative and informative
- Cleaner procedure numbering  

This version also addresses review comments from Hoamian and Adrian, I will
follow-up specifically in separate emails later. 

BR, Dan and the draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce authors. 

-----Original Message-----
From: I-D-Announce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: 06 June 2019 19:56
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-08.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element
(PCE).
        Authors         : Dhruv Dhody
                          Young Lee
                          Daniele Ceccarelli
                          Jongyoon Shin
                          Daniel King
                          Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
        Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-08.txt
        Pages           : 22
        Date            : 2019-06-06

Abstract:
   A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information on
   the current network state, including: computed Label Switched Path
   (LSPs), reserved resources within the network, and pending path
   computation requests. This information may then be considered when
   computing new traffic engineered LSPs, and for associated
   and dependent LSPs, received from Path Computation Clients (PCCs).
   Initialize the result of path computation from PCE is also helpful
   for the PCC to gracefully establish the computed LSP.

   The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture,
   provides an architecture to allow the optimum sequence of
   inter-connected domains to be selected, and network policy to be
   applied if applicable, via the use of a hierarchical relationship
   between PCEs.

   Combining the capabilities of Stateful PCE and the Hierarchical PCE
   would be advantageous. This document describes general considerations
   and use cases for the deployment of Stateful, and not Stateless, PCEs
   using the Hierarchical PCE architecture.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-08
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-08

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-08


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to