Hi Hari, Thanks for the review, comments are fixed and new version is uploaded.
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-06 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-06 Regards, Mahendra From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:09 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) <[email protected]>; Mahendra Singh Negi <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-05 + Authors. On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:31 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: ------- Header: In general should we use "Stateful PCE" or "stateful PCE" ? I see in RFC 8231 we use "Stateful PCE" OLD: Ability for a stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) NEW: Ability for a Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) -------- Abstract: OLD: A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) NEW: A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) ------------- Section 4: To make it more clear, it would be good to state that C and D flags are mutually exclusive in PCUpd message. OLD: The PCE SHOULD NOT send control request for LSP which is already delegated to the PCE, i.e. if the D flag is set in the PCUpd message, then C flag SHOULD NOT be set. NEW: The D Flag and C Flag are mutually exclusive in PCUpd message. The PCE SHOULD NOT send control request for LSP which is already delegated to thePCE, i.e. if the D flag is set in the PCUpd message, then C flag SHOULD NOT be set. -------------- I dont see Adrian's suggestion being implemented in Section 8 in the latest draft. It would be good to have this apart from the Security Considerations. SUGGESTED: Not sure whether it belongs in 8.1 or 8.3 or 7... The Security considerations section suggests dropping delegation requests if the PCC is swamped. I think you need to configure the threshold for swamping, and to recommend that the issue be logged. IMPLEMENTED: ----------------- Thanks, Hari
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
