Hi Tal,

Thanks for your review.

I have made an update handling the nits.

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-11

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 1:05 PM Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The 
> Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as 
> they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special 
> request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing 
> ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it 
> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last 
> Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion 
> or by updating the draft.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce
> Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi
> Review Date: July, 2019
> Intended Status: Informational
>
> Summary:
> No issues found. This document is ready for publication.
>
> Nits:
> -Section 1.1. is the only subsection of Section 1. Please consider adding a 
> subsection "Background" that will consist of the text before the current 1.1.
> -"(previously computed paths" - there is no matching ")"
> -Section 6.3 - please consider if this should be moved to the security 
> considerations section, or add a reference from the security considerations 
> section to this one.
>
> Best regards,
> Tal.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to