Ups.. yes that’s what I meant…
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 16:21, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the catch, Mirja. > > But authors, please fix as "the association types are defined" > > Thanks, > Adrian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: 09 July 2019 15:19 > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Julien Meuric > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on > draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: (with COMMENT) > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-group/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > nit: s/The association type are defined/The associations type are defined/ > > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
