Wow This is a fast turn-around: you cleared all my COMMENTs
Regards and thank you for your work for the IETF community! -éric On 10/07/2019, 15:20, "Dhruv Dhody" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Eric, Thanks for your review. Fixed in the working copy. Working Copy: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt Regards, Dhruv > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of éric Vyncke via > Datatracker > Sent: 10 July 2019 13:34 > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-pce-association- > [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association- > group-09: (with COMMENT) > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-group/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work put into this document. I have two COMMENTs and > one > nits: all easy to fix > > Regards, > > -éric > > == COMMENTS == > > -- Section 6.1 -- > > Please state the obvious: unused "Flags" bits MUST be set to 0. > > -- Section 6.1.1 -- > > Figure 5 includes the type and length of the TLV while figure 1 in > previous section does not include the type and length field. Or am I > misreading the figures ? > > == NITS == > > -- Section 4.1 (and others) -- > > The caption of figure 1 contains "TLV" but it is actually only about the > "V" of the "TLV" ;-) See above COMMENT > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
