Dear PCE WG, As part of the WG business, we have recently identified some expectations surrounding RFC 8231. The chairs have been thinking on the way to progress associated improvements. Thus, it seems to us that properly splitting the resulting work will be more efficient, avoiding to delay too much the easy pieces. We suggest to work on both an Informational clarification and Standard Track updates. The former may start from some of material in draft-koldychev-pce-operational. The latter has already started with draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags. This I-D being a very focused and uncontroversial fix, we will move it directly to WGLC and we expect any other standards track updates to be collected together in a new I-D.
Thanks, Dhruv & Julien _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
