Hi Mirja, On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:18 PM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11: No Objection > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for quickly addressing the TSV-ART review (and thanks to David for this > very clear and well explained review)! I would have preferred to actually see > a > normative requirement as original proposed by David ("sample interval SHOULD > NOT be less than 1 minute") in section 5.2.1. Also I would have expected the > proposed new text to show up somewhere in section 4 (maybe even as a new > subsection). > >
Thanks for your review, as well as to David for TSV-ART review. Regarding normative - as there could be different transport protocol (with different congestion techniques), I feel providing a clear warning to the reader about changing the default is better than using 1 min. I thought in some scenario the issue could be seen even if set to 2 mins! And with the help of David we have consensuses on the current text. I have added text in section 4 and 5.2.1, with reference to section 6.6 in the working copy. Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-12.txt Thanks! Dhruv _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
