Hi Martin, Thanks for the nits. I incorporated them in the working copy.
Thanks! Dhruv Commit: https://github.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/commit/4fa5e2f64a050fcc42bcfaf85c492b8dd5b4e863 Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-13&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-14.txt On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 3:16 PM Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hi, > > thank you for this document. I only have nit type comments: > > s/hierarchy of stateful PCEs play a crucial role/hierarchy of stateful PCEs > plays a crucial role/ > > The ability to compute shortest constrained TE LSPs > not sure what you mean by "shortest constrained" > > s/the MDSC decompose/the MDSC decomposes/ > > Different signaling methods for inter-domain RSVP-TE signaling > s/methods/options/ > > s/the PCE further propagates/the C-PCE further propagates/ > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
