Hi Roman, Thanks for your review, all the comments are addressed in the new version.
New version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-13 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-13 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-13 Regards, Mahendra On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:20 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 6. Per “Also, as stated in [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group], much > of > the information carried in the Disjointness Association object, as per this > document is not extra sensitive”, I appreciate that the language of “not > extra > sensitive” comes from Section 8 of draft-ietf-pce-association-group and > this > text is merely trying to reiterate this observation. However, I would > recommend not making any assumptions about the particular environments by > stating the following: > > OLD: > Also, as stated in [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group], much of the > information > carried in the Disjointness Association object, as per this document is not > extra sensitive. It often reflects information that can also be derived > from > the LSP Database, but association provides a much easier grouping of > related > LSPs and messages. The disjointness association could provide an adversary > with the opportunity to eavesdrop on the relationship between the LSPs. > > NEW > Also, as stated in [I-D.ietf-pce-association-group], much of the > information > carried in the Disjointness Association object reflects information that > can > also be derived from the LSP Database, but association provides a much > easier > grouping of related LSPs and messages. The disjointness association could > provide an adversary with the opportunity to eavesdrop on the relationship > between the LSPs and understand the network topology. > > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
