Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I found this document clear to follow, so thanks. I’m somewhat concerned there are no implementations. Nits: Sec 5. Specify the error if more than 1 TLV of any type is present. Sec 7. The text is incomplete for the (*, G) case. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
