On August 27, 2020 at 6:30:41 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Adrian: Hi! > I think there are three points we can work on to add to the document: > 1. PCEP-installed FlowSpecs MUST NOT be redistributed to other routers > using BGP. Just to be clear, redistributing PCEP FS was never the intent. Are there cases where PCEP information is redistributed into a routing protocol? If not, then I don't think this first point is necessary. > 2. PCEP-installed FlowSpecs are intended to be installed only at the > head-end of the LSP to which they direct traffic. It is acceptable (and > potentially desirable) that other routers have FlowSpecs that match the > same traffic but direct it onto different routes or to different LSPs. ok > 3. Note that changes to the wider routing system (such as the distribution > and installation of BGP FlowSpecs, or fluctuations in the IGP link state > database) might mean that traffic matching the PCEP FlowSpec never reaches > the head end of the LSP at which the PCEP FlowSpec is installed. This may > or may not be desirable according to the operator's traffic engineering and > routing policies, but it is not an effect that this document seeks to > address. That is what I'm looking for: a mention of the potential... Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
