Dear All,
We have just updated draft-chen-pce-sr-policy-ifit and renamed to 
draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit. 
The draft has deeply changed because, as discussed in mailing list, the PCEP 
extension is now applied as TLVs to the LSP Attributes and not to the 
Association Groups.
In addition, the PCEP extensions for IFIT are now general and the LSPA TLVs are 
applicable for all path types, of course if the IFIT methods (IOAM and 
Alternate Marking) are supported by the data plane. So the application to SR 
policy is now mentioned as use case.

Feedbacks and suggestions are always welcome.

Best Regards,

Giuseppe

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 12:27 PM
To: Huanan Chen <[email protected]>; Tianran Zhou 
<[email protected]>; Liweidong (Poly) <[email protected]>; Hang Yuan 
<[email protected]>; Giuseppe Fioccola <[email protected]>; 
wangyali <[email protected]>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-00.txt has been successfully 
submitted by Giuseppe Fioccola and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:           draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit
Revision:       00
Title:          Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) 
Extensions to Enable IFIT
Document date:  2020-08-28
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          17
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit


Abstract:
   This document defines PCEP extensions to distribute In-situ Flow
   Information Telemetry (IFIT) information.  So that IFIT behavior can
   be enabled automatically when the path is instantiated.  In-situ Flow
   Information Telemetry (IFIT) refers to network OAM data plane on-path
   telemetry techniques, in particular the most popular are In-situ OAM
   (IOAM) and Alternate Marking.  The IFIT attributes here described can
   be generalized for all path types but the application to Segment
   Routing (SR) is considered in this document.  The SR policy is a set
   of candidate SR paths consisting of one or more segment lists and
   necessary path attributes.  It enables instantiation of an ordered
   list of segments with a specific intent for traffic steering.


                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to