Hi, I have read this draft, and I support this document being published as an RFC.
Just a few nits are found and listed as below. 1. "may instantiate LSPs and specifies" -> "...specify" 2. "[RFC8697] specify" -> "... specifies" 3. "Error- Value 4" -> "Error-Value 4" 4. " In some cases to apply a PCE policy successfully, it is required to also associate some policy parameters that needs to be evaluated, to successfully apply the said policy. " -> " In some cases to apply a PCE policy successfully, it is required to also associate some policy parameters that need to be evaluated. " 5. "The TLV could include one or more policy related parameter" -> "... parameters" 6. "a 4-bytes alignment" -> "4-byte" 7. "The PCEP peer implementation need to be aware" ->" The PCEP peer implementation needs to be aware" 8. "Further, if one or more parameters received in the POLICY-PARAMETERS-TLV received by the PCEP speaker " -> "Further, if one or more parameters in the POLICY-PARAMETERS-TLV received by the PCEP speaker " 9. " IANA is requested to confirm the early-allocated codepoints " -> " IANA is requested to confirm the early-allocated code point" 10. "in which case the an operator MUST " -> " in which case the operator MUST " 11. "This module supports associations as defined in [RFC8697] and thus support the Policy Association groups " -> "This module supports associations as defined in [RFC8697] and thus supports the Policy Association groups " 12. " this document borrow some of " -> " this document borrowed some of " Best regards, Shuping > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; pce-chairs > <[email protected]> > Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy > > Hi WG, > > This email starts a working group last call for > draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support or > concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to > RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that > you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your > opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. > > The WG LC will end on 21st September 2020. > > Thanks, > Dhruv & Julien > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
