Hi Julien and all, Sorry for being late with feedback. I think that PCECC must have SR extensions, thus this draft closes this gap. The draft describes PCEP extensions which are crucial (Node/Prefix, Adjacency and Binding SID allocation as well as PCECC capability) for PCECC deployment in SR environment. I support this draft adoption.
SY, Boris Hi all, PCECC extensions are progressing towards the IESG. It is time to share your thoughts about draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09. Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
