I support the adoption given points rased by Dhruv are addressed ( post adoption in fine)
Cheers, Jeff On Jan 8, 2021, 1:32 AM -0800, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>, wrote: > Hi WG, Authors, > > Speaking as a WG participant... > > I find the functionality described in this I-D to be very useful. But, > I have one concern that I would like to be addressed before adoption > or at least get an agreement on (to be handled post-adoption). > > I am not in favor of how the PST is being used in the I-D. The PST is used - > - between PCEs to indicate inter-domain TE processing > - between PCE and the head-end (2 PST for RSVP-TE & SR each, but for > inter-domain i.e also allocate and report stitching label) > > We basically need a mechanism to request allocation and reporting of > stitching labels. I strongly suggest using a flag and/or a new TLV, I > find the use of PST for this inappropriate. > > A weird side-effect of the current proposal is that every time we have > a new PST defined (PCECC is post-WGLC), we would need another one for > inter-domain. > > Moreover, wouldn't it be better if this I-D is independent of the > per-domain path setup type? Section 6.3 allows for mixed technologies > and the protocol procedures between cooperating PCEs can be defined > such that they are independent of the per-domain path setup type to > allow for any current or future path setup types. I see no reason to > differentiate between RSVP-TE and SR (section 6.2 is all about > forwarding on border nodes, and not about PCEP). > > I discussed this with the authors earlier, where we basically pushed > the can down the road, I hope we can resolve this quickly now :) > > Thanks! > Dhruv > (As a WG participant) > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:23 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi WG, > > > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > > draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04 > > > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons > > - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are > > you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to > > the list. > > > > To accommodate for the holiday season, this adoption poll will end on > > 11th Jan 2021 (Monday). > > > > Thanks! > > Dhruv > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
