I’m also concerned about having PCECC as a requirement for anything in that draft. It would break backward compatibility.
Thanks, Mike. From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Siva Sivabalan Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 7:13 PM To: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; pce-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/SID to the BSID draft Hi Dhruv and all: Section 7 states: Section 4 includes a case where a specified value for the binding label/SID is requested to be allocated by the PCC. Section 4 (of v5) states: If a PCE requires a PCC to allocate a specific binding value, it may do so by sending a PCUpd or PCInitiate message containing a TE-PATH- BINDING TLV. Could we please add a bit more clarity to the motivation for the proposed change ? Also, we may want to indicate that how a PCE figures out the available labels on a PCC, etc, is outside the scope of this ID. Thanks, Siva On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:41 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi WG, Authors, As part of the handling of RTGDIR comments [1] for the PCECC I-D [2], it was discovered that it is a better idea to handle the Binding SID allocation by the PCE in the BSID I-D [3]. Julien and I agree. Also, it makes sense to move the new P-flag in the LSP object here (from path segment WG I-D [4]). Cheng and I have this proposed update - Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-05&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06.txt Please let us know if anyone has any concerns with this approach. This draft is in our WG LC Queue [5]. Thanks! Dhruv/Cheng [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/4n6FpBoDHjnGppKH4bcVotUu_hE/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/ [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment/ [5] https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pce/wiki/WikiStart#WGLastCallQueue
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
