Hi WG, As we have not received any objection, we consider that we have a consensus on this early codepoint allocation. We are thus going to proceed with the request.
Thanks, Dhruv & Julien On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:16 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors of > draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement for an early code point > allocation. > > RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed: > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or > believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other > reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining the > reasons. If the chairs hear no objections by Monday, Jan 25th, we > will kick off the early allocation request. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
