Thank Martin for the review comments. This was an error text as there is no reporting for tail-end/reverse LSPs on egress nodes. Fixed in the latest (rev 14) version.
URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-14.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-14 Thanks, Rakesh From: Pce <[email protected]> on behalf of Martin Duke via Datatracker <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 12:32 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The figures in Section 3 repeatedly state use the phrase "reports the reverse LSP1 (not shown for simplicity)". Not being an expert in these technologies, I found the consistent omission of this from the figure to be confusing, not clarifying. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
