Hi Eric, I discussed this offline with one of the authors, who confirmed that while NAI in RFC 8664 uses a pair, in this case, the pair is not needed for the next-hop information and it can be updated as suggested by you.
Thanks! Dhruv On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:50 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:35 PM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-12: Discuss > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thank you for the work put into this document. I have not had time to > > review in > > details though :( but I appreciated the detailed description as well as the > > useful time diagrams. > > > > Please find below one blocking DISCUSS point (which may be my bad > > understanding), some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be > > appreciated). > > > > I hope that this helps to improve the document, > > > > Regards, > > > > -éric > > > > == DISCUSS == > > > > -- Section 7.3.1 -- > > LINKLOCAL-IPV6-ID-ADDRESS TLV: I fail to understand why there are two > > addresses > > in this TLV while others have one one ? Also is 'local' and 'remote' really > > global addresses ? > > > > > > Erik Kline had the same comment. > > The text and encoding is inspired by RFC 8664 > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8664.html#section-4.3.2 > > which says - > > IPv6 Link-Local Adjacency: > Specified as a pair of (global IPv6 address, interface ID) tuples. It > is used to describe an IPv6 adjacency for a link that uses only > link-local IPv6 addresses. Each global IPv6 address is configured on a > specific router, so together they identify a pair of adjacent routers. > The interface IDs identify the link that the adjacency is formed over. > > A reference to RFC8664 and more description can be added. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > == COMMENTS == > > > > A minor comment: the abstract is clear but probably a little too long for an > > abstract. > > > > -- Section 7.3 -- > > Just wonder why LINKLOCAL-IPV6-ID-ADDRES is not mentioned in this section > > but > > well in the next one ? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
