Hi Aijun That’s great to here interest from operators in PCEP-LS!
Kind Regards Gyan On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 9:30 PM Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Also as a telco, we are expecting the implementation of PCEP-LS, and once > it is ready, we will try to deploy it in the network. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Aijun Wang > > China Telecom > > > > *From:* pce-boun...@ietf.org <pce-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *???(Naas > Transformation ?) > *Sent:* Friday, April 2, 2021 9:14 AM > *To:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusa...@gmail.com>; pce@ietf.org; > draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep...@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>; > Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> > *Subject:* Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn > > > > Dear Gyan, > > > > As a telco, we are interested in the upgrade of PCEP. > > PCEP and H-PCE scenarios is always being considered as valuable tools for > solving our issues in telco’s multi-domain environment. > > > > Regards, > > Peter > > > > > > *From:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusa...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:36 AM > *To:* pce@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep...@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody < > d...@dhruvdhody.com>; Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> > *Subject:* [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn > > > > Dear PCE WG, > > > > We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap > and a summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE > were highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused. > > > > This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and > development efforts. This work is not a replacement for any of the existing > mechanisms. There are specific scenarios highlighted where the reuse of > PCEP sessions for this information is deemed useful. To make progress, it > may not be useful to rehash the beauty context between everyone's favorite > protocol :). What would be useful would be - finding out if there is still > interest in this experimental work by some in the WG; are there strong > technical objections for the experiment in its limited scope etc... > > > > As a next step, it would be good to define the scope of the experiments > and expected output especially targeting the scalability concerns as well > as impact in other protocols and the network, etc. > > > > Thanks! > > Gyan (on behalf of co-authors) > > > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf > > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/ > > == > > > > <http://www.verizon.com/> > > *Gyan Mishra* > > *Network Solutions Architect * > > *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* > > *M 301 502-1347* > > > > > > > > 이 메일은 지정된 수취인만을 위해 작성되었으며, 중요한 정보나 저작권을 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. 어떠한 권한 없이, 본 문서에 > 포함된 정보의 전부 또는 일부를 무단으로 제3자에게 공개, 배포, 복사 또는 사용하는 것을 엄격히 금지합니다. 만약, 본 메일이 잘못 > 전송된 경우, 발신인 또는 당사에 알려주시고, 본 메일을 즉시 삭제하여 주시기 바랍니다. > This E-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright > material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you > receive this email by mistake, please either delete it without reproducing, > distributing or retaining copies thereof or notify the sender immediately. > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
