Hi WG, I support adoption of this draft.
Regards, Samuel From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Yadav, Bhupendra Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:14 PM To: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pce] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG, I support adoption of this draft by PCE WG. This draft provides a clean and logical mechanism for conveying multiple paths peers. I am willing to work on this draft. Thanks, Bhupendra ________________________________ From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: April 14, 2021 10:52 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 [datatracker.ietf.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05__;!!OSsGDw!eldrJdOkDwMDM1no5YY7zZpbQOXkYFu6_CJ5zLNtkwT5rG2g48gBMFqt3LHF$> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Wednesday 28th April. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
