Hi PCE WG, I support WG adoption of this document. It's a good improvement to the protocol. Would be good to clarify how it applies to objects that encode multiple constraints. For example, the LSPA object encodes affinity, plus other stuff like protection, priority and TLVs. Is it possible to ignore only some of those constraints? Perhaps by including multiple copies of the LSPA object?
Thanks, Mike. -----Original Message----- From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional Hi all, This e-mail starts an adoption poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item? Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the WG should not adopt it. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
