Hi WG, The draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec [1 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec/>] has been in the RFC Ed Queue [2 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C349>] for the last 344 days because of a MISREF to draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn [3 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn/>]. The L2 flowspec in the IDR WG is waiting for the Flowspec V2 proposal [4 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-idr-flowspec-v2/>] and further two independent implementations.
The authors discussed a way to untangle this by removing the L2-related (rather late additions) from this I-D and moving into a separate I-D. We discussed this with both past and current responsible ADs and we have their blessings for this straightforward removal of L2 Flow Filter TLV so that we can make progress. Please find the Diff [5 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12-remove-l2.txt>] and txt [6 <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12-remove-l2.txt>] with the limited changes. Please let us know if you have any comments or concerns. We would also be reaching out to the RFC Editor in parallel. Thanks! Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors) [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec/ [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C349 [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn/ [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-idr-flowspec-v2/ [5] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12-remove-l2.txt [6] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-12-remove-l2.txt
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
