Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. It explains a lot how RFC 8986 'network programming' can be used in a PCE/PCC environment and it is welcome. Even if parts of the document is difficult to read (e.g., the use case example). Please find below one non-blocking COMMENT point. Special thanks to Julien Meuric for the shepherd's write-up including the section about the WG consensus (even if I would have appreciated a justification for the PS status). I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric There are still many typos in the document; even if the RFC editor will fix them, let's try to avoid them. -- Abstract -- Introducing "(SID)" after Segment Identifier would help the reader to understand the content of this document. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
