Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Theresa Enghardt for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/IyiRN3TEd1p_yEs0UviVwhgH04Q). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. Section 1.2. , paragraph 4, nit: - binding label/SID, and associted error handling. + binding label/SID, and associated error handling. + + Section 1.2. , paragraph 2, nit: > and PCE can use this TLV, how they can can allocate a binding label/SID, and > ^^^^^^^ Possible typo: you repeated a word. Document references draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-17, but -18 is the latest available revision. Document references draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-14, but -16 is the latest available revision. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
