Thanks Dhruv for the clarification. On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 5:17 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mrinmoy, > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 4:52 PM Mrinmoy Das <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Team, >> >> I found below SR-ERO validation in RFC 8664, 5.2.1 >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8664#section-5.2.1>. SR-ERO >> Validation >> >> The SR-ERO subobjects can be classified according to whether they >> contain a SID representing an MPLS label value or an index value, or >> no SID. If a PCC detects that the SR-ERO subobjects are a mixture of >> more than one of these types, then it MUST send a PCErr message with >> Error-Type = 10 ("Reception of an invalid object") and Error-value = >> 20 ("Inconsistent SIDs in SR-ERO/SR-RRO subobjects"). >> >> >> As per my understanding of the above text, there could be three types of >> SIDs: >> >> 1. *SID index: *S-bit = 0, M = 0,C = 0 >> 2. *SID as MPLS label:* S-bit = 0, M = 1, C = 0/1 >> 3. *Null:* S-bit = 1 >> >> Now, if a LSP contains 3 SR-ERO subobjects then all those three should >> have the same SID type, e.g. all may be type 1, or type 2 or type 3 and >> there shouldn't be any combination of these 3 types. >> >> Is this understanding correct? Please let me know. >> >> > Yes! Your understanding is correct. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > > >> Thanks, >> Mrinmoy >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >> >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
