Hi WG, We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the early allocation process.
Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:50 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors > of draft-ietf-pce-multipath for an early code point allocation for the > codepoints listed in > > - Section 9.1 PCEP Object > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-multipath-05.html#section-9.1 > - Section 9.2 PCEP TLV > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-multipath-05.html#section-9.2 > - Section 9.3 PCEP-Error > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-multipath-05.html#section-9.3 > > RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed: > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria or believes > that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send > an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If the chairs hear no > objections by Thursday, April 14th, we will kick > off the early allocation request. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
