Hi PCE WG Just sharing the update notification. Per last IETF Session comments, draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement was updated to remove the words related to "MUST constraint" and "MAY constraint". It's been re-worked for clarification of applying E flag. Authors also observed some missing text (but already assumed behavior) in regards to how to treat Node SIDs, so some language was added for that as well.
Cheers, Andrew On 2022-05-04, 7:00 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-05.txt has been successfully submitted by Andrew Stone and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement Revision: 05 Title: Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP Document date: 2022-05-04 Group: pce Pages: 12 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-05.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-05 Abstract: This document updates [RFC5440] to clarify usage of the local protection desired bit signalled in Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP). This document also introduces a new flag for signalling protection strictness in PCEP. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
