Hi, Andrew: I think the update contents will be helpful for the reader to understand the usage of "UNPROCTED MANDATORY" and "UNPROTECTED PREFERRED" type. Support for its forwarding.
Aijun Wang China Telecom -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2022年6月21日 22:14 收件人: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>; [email protected] 主题: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-06.txt Hi Aijun, PCE WG Document was updated with additional descriptive text on the use case/scenarios. We appreciate any additional feedback or comments regarding the WGLC from the group! Thanks! Andrew On 2022-06-20, 12:18 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-06.txt has been successfully submitted by Andrew Stone and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement Revision: 06 Title: Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP Document date: 2022-06-20 Group: pce Pages: 12 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-06.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-06 Abstract: This document updates [RFC5440] to clarify usage of the local protection desired bit signalled in Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP). This document also introduces a new flag for signalling protection strictness in PCEP. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
