Dear authors of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls,
Considering the level of change after the shepherd's review of the aforementioned I-D, I've performed a 2nd review. Only some minor issues/nits remain. Please find them below.
- Page 1: s/provides extensions required/provides the extensions required/ - P.4:* s/do not cover the GMPLS networks/do not cover GMPLS-controlled networks/
* OLD: The various requirements for stateful GMPLS including PCE-initiation for GMPLS LSPs is provided in Section 4. An overview of the PCEP extensions are specified... NEW: The various requirements for stateful GMPLS, including PCE-initiation for GMPLS LSPs, are provided in Section 4. An overview of the PCEP extensions is specified... - P.5: * s/the LSP delegated to the PCE/the LSPs delegated to the PCE/ * s/the change of the LSP./the change of the LSPs./ * s/sent by PCC to PCEs./sent by PCCs to PCEs./* s/An LSP Initiate Request (PCInitiate) messages are/An LSP Initiate Request (PCInitiate) message is/
* s/The PCE-Initiated LSP would follow/PCE-initiated LSPs follow/ - P.6:* Knowing that the END-POINT line formatting used to be broken, considering a different character for the 2nd level of bullets may limit the ambiguity in further editions.
* s/MUST be use to specify/MUST be used to specify/ * s/and not in this document as well./nor in this document./ - P.10: * A title should be added after the figure.* s/X bit is defined in [RFC5521]./X bit: Same as the X bit defined in XRO sub-objects by [RFC5521] (i.e. mandatory vs. desired)./
- P.11: * OLD: If the PCC supports the extensions as per this document (understands the U flag that indicates the stateful LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY) but did not... NEW: If the PCC understands the U flag that indicates the stateful LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY but did not... * OLD: If the PCE supports the extensions as per this document (understands the R flag that indicates the stateful LSP-REPORT-CAPABILITY) but did not... NEW: If the PCE understands the R flag that indicates the stateful LSP-REPORT-CAPABILITY but did not... - P.12: * OLD: If the PCC supports the extensions as per this document (understands the I flag that indicates LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY) but did not... NEW: If the PCC understands the I flag that indicates LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY but did not... * OLD: A stateful PCE performs the re-optimization when the R bit is set in RP object. NEW: A stateful PCE is expected to perform an LSP re-optimization when receiving a message with the R bit set in the RP object. - P.13:* s/the receiving PCE or PCC would send/the receiving PCE or PCC MUST send/
Regards, Julien
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
