Dear WG I support adoption by PCE WG and would be willing to work on the draft.
I support IFIT PCE extension to carry the IFIT attributes for in-situ IOAM on path telemetry. I do agree this would be very useful for operators. I was looking for a framework draft for IFIT and this is what I found. I think a framework draft for IFIT solution should be addressed in the draft in the introduction. I noticed that there are a number of ifit related drafts across many WGs with a variety of authors and it appears no common author across all the documents. Is there an IFIT framework draft of the overall IFIT architecture and goals? IFIT is a component of IPPM IOAM but I think it should have its own framework draft. I did find this IFIT framework draft which I don’t see as informational reference in this document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ Of all the IFIT related drafts I do see one adopted. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-ifit/ Kind Regards Gyan On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:59 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
