Hi, I am not able to understand how you would be adding the Queuing Information Structure in ERO (it has not space)?
While it is possible to add Queue Information Structure to SR-ERO/SRv6-ERO sub-object (similar to the SRv6 SID structure), we need to staop and think if it is the correct approach? To me defining them as new sub-objects makes more sense, similar to Label or Hop Attributes! And think what would be the best way to signal them in RSVP-TE in parallel. *Common comments to both DetNet drafts -- Perhaps it would be a good idea to first list out all the requirements for PCEP. We could then get a confirmation of those requirements from DetNet. I also note that both drafts have different terminology.- PCE WG can then decide the best strategy to encode this, where reusing the existing objects makes sense and where defining a new one would be a better strategy.- We should take the possible RSVP-TE signaling into consideration* Hope this helps! Thanks! Dhruv
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
