Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I started ballotting DISCUSS on this, but, surprisingly, "You made Warren sad" isn't actually one of the DISCUSS criteria, and so I'm (grudgingly and with bad grace) balloting NoObj instead. ---- 6. Management Considerations A configuration option may be provided for advertising and withdrawing PCEP security capability via OSPF and IS-IS. ---- This section seems more than pointless to me - it seems (admittedly very slightly!) harmful. It doesn't actually *say* anything useful, but the very act of it showing up in the index / table of contents gives the impression that there may be actually Management Considerations text somewhere below. This initially made me all excited, and set my heart a flutter -- only to be crushed when I actually read it. Please consider ripping the section out - AFAICT, it doesn't accomplish anything, other than leading to false hope... _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
