Hi Murray,
On 10/10/22, 12:26 PM, "Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker" <nore...@ietf.org>
wrote:
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-12: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be simple to resolve, but it has to be clarified:
The shepherd writeup says there were IPR claims made about the document.
The
question also asks for a summary of the resulting discussion, but the
shepherd
writeup doesn't provide one. Can we confirm that the discussion was had, or
some other answer to the question can be provided?
I have updated the Shepherd's report.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
