Hi Roman, Thanks for your review!
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 7:16 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-vn-association/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ** Section 4. > > The Virtual Network Identifier is a human-readable > string that identifies a VN and can be specified with the association > information. > > Is this “associated information” conveyed with a VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV? > If > so, it would be clearer to say (something to the effect of): > > NEW > > The Virtual Network Identifier is a human-readable string that identifies > a VN > and can be specified with the association information conveyed in a > VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV. > > > Good suggestion! Request authors to update in the next version. Thanks! Dhruv > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
