On 2022-10-20, at 16:51, John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > > I read this comment differently. Here’s what I took it to mean. In the clause > "Unassigned flags MUST be set to zero on transmission”, if you read that in > the narrowest possible way, it might require an implementation to know what > flags are unassigned, so that it can set them to zero on transmission. If the > clause were changed to “Flags unsupported by the implementation MUST be set > to zero on transmission” I think that would be responsive to (how I read) the > comment. The same point would apply to Section 3.1. > > That’s just my reading of course and Lars should clarify as needed.
This is exactly what I was trying to express, thanks. Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
