As a co-author, I would like to see the document get adopted by the WG. The use of "color" to associate a TE tunnel/policy with an intent has been widely discussed in other routing area WGs -- the PCEP extension proposed in this document to carry the "color" attribute is a useful addition to the service-mapping toolkit. As far as the authors are concerned, there are no open issues.
Regards, -Pavan On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:37 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
