I would like to get some clarification on the text below (understand that a publication request has been made for the draft).
** >From Section 5: When L-flag is not set and E-flag is not set then PCE SHOULD consider the protection eligibility as UNPROTECTED PREFERRED but MAY consider protection eligibility as UNPROTECTED MANDATORY constraint. When L-flag is not set and E-flag is set then PCE MUST consider the protection eligibility as UNPROTECTED MANDATORY constraint. ** For the scenario where both the L-flag and the E-flag are not set (first statement above), it seems okay to just say that the "PCE MUST consider the protection eligibility as UNPROTECTED PREFERRED". Is there a good reason for both the "SHOULD (UNPROTECTED PREFERRED)" and "MAY (UNPROTECTED MANDATORY)" clauses to be included here (and keep things ambiguous)? Regards, -Pavan
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
