Hi Quan, We have addressed your comments in the latest version, please check it.
Thanks, Cheng The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 3:25 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Cheng Li <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Zhangka <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your reply! I agree with you and it is much better to align with SR-MPLS using LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV. Best Regards, Quan Original From: DhruvDhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: 熊泉00091065; Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Date: 2023年02月27日 13:06 Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Quan, Cheng, I think it is best if this is aligned with SR-MPLS i.e this draft- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification/ That draft suggests using LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV. We can move the IANA allocation to this document as it is nearing WGLC and the SR-MPLS draft can simply reuse it! Thoughts? Thanks! Dhruv On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:16 AM <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Cheng, Thanks for your reply! The suggested text maybe like this following shown. " * V: When this bit is set to 1, the PCC should perform the SID verification in validity of an Explicit Candidate Path as described in as per Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]. When a segment list of an explicit candidate path be invalid, a PCErr message should be sent. " I am not sure about the last PCEP error part. Maybe the PCC should notify the PCE when the candidate path is invalid. Best Regards, Quan Original From: ChengLi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: 熊泉00091065;[email protected]<mailto:00091065%[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Date: 2023年02月20日 15:14 Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Quan, The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text? Thanks, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 5:16 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Dear PCE WG, I support the WG LC of this draft. I reviewed this document in details and I think it is useful and reasonable for SRv6 networks with PCEP extension. Thanks the authors for the well-written draft and I have a suggestion for section 4.3.1 with text "V: The "SID verification" bit usage is as per Section 5.1 of [RFC9256]." Maybe it is better to add more description on how to use the V bit for SID verification. Best Regards, Quan <<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 <<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Mon, 13 February 2023 17:38 UTCShow header <<Dear PCE WG, This message starts a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you have about <<this document using the PCE mailing list. This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023. Thanks, Julien -- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-<<ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
