Hi Mrinmoy,

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 2:34 PM Mrinmoy Das <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
> Could anybody please clarify my doubt?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Mrinmoy
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 3:22 PM Mrinmoy Das <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Team,
>>
>> I found below  highlighted text in RFC 8231:
>>
>> *6.2 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8231#section-6.2>.  The PCUpd 
>> Message, page- 29*
>>
>>
>>
>>    The PCC SHOULD minimize the traffic interruption and MAY use the
>>
>>    make-before-break procedures described in [RFC3209 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3209>] in order to
>>
>>    achieve this goal.  If the make-before-break procedures are used, two
>>
>>    paths will briefly coexist.  The PCC MUST send separate PCRpt
>>
>>    messages for each, identified by the LSP-IDENTIFIERS TLV.  When the
>>
>>    old path is torn down after the head end switches over the traffic,
>>
>>    this event MUST be reported by sending a PCRpt message with the
>>
>>    LSP-IDENTIFIERS-TLV of the old path and the R bit set.  The
>>
>>    SRP-ID-number that the PCC associates with this PCRpt MUST be
>>
>>    0x00000000.  Thus, a make-before-break operation will typically
>>
>>    result in at least two PCRpt messages, one for the new path and one
>>
>>    for the removal of the old path (more messages may be possible if
>>
>>    intermediate states are reported).
>>
>>
>> So, as per the  highlighted  text above, *in case of MBB, the 2nd
>> PCRpt(old path) that is torn down needs to set SRP-ID to 0.*
>> Does this behavior apply to both RSVP-TE and SR-TE LSP?
>>
>>
If the make-before-break technique is being used, then yes the procedure
from RFC 8231 applies.  The PCRpt that signifies "break" is considered
unsolicited and thus SRP-ID is 0x0. Unless explicitly told, this should
apply to all path setup types. Note that MBB is not mandatory.

Thanks!
Dhruv


> Thanks & Regards,
>> Mrinmoy
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to