Hi WG, We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the early allocation process.
Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 9:00 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors of > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip for an early code point allocation > for the codepoints listed in Section 13 - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-23#name-iana-considerations-35 > > RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed: > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria or believes > that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send an > email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If the chairs hear no > objections by Tuesday, June 27th, we will kick off the early allocation > request. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
