I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks, Siva On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:30 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > We dont have an IPR response from you both! Please respond ASAP! > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:21 PM > Subject: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and > contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF > IPR rules. > Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: > - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be > disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. > - I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been > disclosed to the IETF. > - I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been > disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a > timely manner. > > Thanks, > > Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
