Hi WG, We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the early allocation process.
Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:27 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo > for an early code point allocation for the following allocations - > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-04.html#section-7.1 > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-04.html#section-7.3 > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-04.html#section-7.5 > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-04.html#section-7.6 > > Note that the SRv6 related codepoints are not requested as the registry > for them does not currently exist. > > RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed: > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > According to the chairs’ review the 7120 criteria are met; if you disagree > and believe that the draft does not meet these criteria or believe that > early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send an > email to the PCE mailing list explaining why by August 24th. > > Thanks! > > Dhruv & Julien >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
