Hi, This early allocation is completed.
Thanks! Dhruv ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 12:43 AM Subject: [IANA #1285829] Re: Early Code Point Allocation for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, < [email protected]> Hi Dhruv and Julien, We've made the following early allocations for this document: PCEP TLV Type Indicators registry (Section 6.1): 67 Color (TEMPORARY - registered 2023-10-30, expires 2024-10-30) [draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-02] STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field registry (Section 6.2): 20 COLOR-CAPABILITY (TEMPORARY - registered 2023-10-30, expires 2024-10-30) [draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-02] LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV Error Code Field registry (Section 6.3): 9 Unsupported Color (TEMPORARY - registered 2023-10-30, expires 2024-10-30) [draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-02] Please see https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep If the document hasn't been approved for publication by September, we'll contact you about renewing for another year. Best regards, Sabrina Tanamal Lead IANA Services Specialist On Sat Oct 28 04:17:50 2023, [email protected] wrote: > Hi IANA, > > Following the procedure for early allocation as per RFC 7120, we would > like > to request early allocation for following code points defined in > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color- > 02.html#section-6 > > An approval from the AD (in cc) can be found in the email chain below. > > 6. IANA Considerations > > 6.1. PCEP TLV Type Indicator > > IANA is requested to allocate a new value in the "PCEP TLV Type > Indicators" sub-registry of the PCEP Numbers registry as follows: > > Value Description Reference > ---------------------------------------------- > TBA1 Color This document > > 6.2. STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field > > IANA is requested to allocate a new bit value in the "STATEFUL-PCE- > CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field" sub-registry of the PCEP Numbers registry > as follows: > > Value Description Reference > ---------------------------------------------- > TBA2 COLOR-CAPABILITY This document > > 6.3. LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV Error Code Field > > IANA is requested to allocate a new error code in the "LSP-ERROR-CODE > TLV Error Code Field" sub-registry of the PCEP Numbers registry as > follows: > > Value Meaning Reference > ---------------------------------------------- > TBA3 Unsupported Color This document > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > PCE WG Co-chairs > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 8:31 PM John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Argh, I thought I had gotten up-to-date yesterday! There’s always > > something. Thanks, and by all means please let me know if there are > > yet > > more things. :-/ > > > > Approved. > > > > —John > > > > > On Oct 27, 2023, at 10:49 AM, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > > > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > This approval is still pending! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Dhruv > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:10 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > > > The authors of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color have requested for the > > > early > > allocation of the codepoints listed in - > > > > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color- > > 02.html#section-6 > > > > > > We polled the WG and there were no objections. According to the > > > chairs’ > > review the RFC 7120 criteria is met. > > > As per the process in the RFC, we now request your approval before > > reaching out to the IANA for the early allocation. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:08 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > Hi WG, > > > > > > We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the > > > early > > allocation process. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:25 PM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > Hi WG, > > > > > > We have received a request from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-pcep- > > > color > > for an early code point allocation for the following allocations > > listed in > > Section 6 - > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color- > > 02.html#section-6 > > > > > > > > > RFC 7120 requires the following criteria to proceed: > > > > > > > > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > > > handling the protocol entities defined by the > > > code points > > > > > > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > > > in an Internet-Draft. > > > > > > > > > c. The specifications of these > > > code points > > > must be stable; i.e., if > > > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > > > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > > > > > According to the chairs’ review the 7120 criteria are met; if you > > disagree and believe that the draft does not meet these criteria or > > believe > > that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please > > send > > an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why by September 21st. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
