Hi Authors, Thanks for this document. Looks good, I've requested IETF last call.
A couple of notes below, they didn't seem worth holding up the last call for, but please consider them for your next revision. - "what PCEPS implementations do if a PCEPS supports more than one version". I don't think PCEPS (second occurrence) takes an article (i.e. referring to "a PCEPS" is weird). Some rewrite seems called for, perhaps s/a PCEPS/one/. - "neither the PCC nor the PCE should establish a PCEPS with TLS connection with an unknown, unexpected, or incorrectly identified peer;" Isn't "PCEPS with TLS" redundant, doesn't the ess in PCEPS imply TLS? In which case, just drop "with TLS". (See also, "ATM machine" :-) Thanks, —John _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
