Hi Everyone,
I read through the document and have the following comments.
1. In Abstract, there are three references (one [RFC9256 ], two [RFC8664]s).
It seems better to remove these references by rephrasing.
2. It seems that an SR Policy has one identifier which consists of Headend,
color and endpoint.
* Should "SR Policy Identifiers uniquely identify the SR Policy within
the network." in section 3.1 be changed to "An SR Policy Identifier uniquely
identifies an SR Policy within the network. "?
* Should "SR Policy Identifiers consist of:" in section 3.1 be changed
to "An SR Policy Identifier consists of:"?
* "Identifiers" in other sections may be changed accordingly.
1. It seems that an SR Policy Candidate Path has one Identifier, which
consists of Protocol Origin, Originator and Discriminator.
* Should "SR Policy Candidate Path Identifiers uniquely identify the SR
Policy Candidate Path within the context of an SR Policy." in section 3.2 be
changed to "An SR Policy Candidate Path Identifier uniquely identifies an SR
Policy Candidate Path within the context of an SR Policy."?
* Should "SR Policy Candidate Path Identifiers consist of:" be changed
to "An SR Policy Candidate Path Identifiers consists of:"?
* "Identifiers" in other sections (e.g., section 4.2.2) may be changed
accordingly.
1. In the second sentence of section 5.4, "streering" seems a typo.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 5:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: pce-chairs <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to
the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you
support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is
ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are
most welcome.
The WG LC will end on Monday 22nd January 2024.
A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption.
Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
