Hi Dhruv and WG,
I support the adoption as co-author.
This draft is useful and reasonable for PCEP extensions to configure the
entropy label positions in SR-MPLS networks as described in RFC8662.
Thanks,
Quan
Original
From: DhruvDhody <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;
Cc: pce-chairs
<[email protected]>;[email protected]
<[email protected]>;
Date: 2024年01月27日 00:50
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
Please respond by Monday 12th Feb 2024.
Please be more vocal during WG polls!
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
